Fix Wi-Fi dead spots with a spare router and ChatGPT’s step-by-step help

← All use cases / Tech help

ToolChatGPT

With weak Wi-Fi at one end of their flat, a blogger planned to use a spare TP-Link router as a repeater. ChatGPT explained it couldn't do that and that an access point suited the cable already in place, then guided them through the menus. Dead spots in the bedroom went from no internet to about 300 Mbps.

Prompt to copy
My Wi-Fi is weak in [ROOM]. My main router is [MODEL] from [PROVIDER], and I have a spare [ROUTER MODEL] and [AN ETHERNET CABLE BETWEEN ROOMS / NO CABLE]. Explain the simplest way to improve coverage with what I've got (repeater, access point or mesh), then walk me through the setup one step at a time, telling me exactly which menus to open. Wait for me to confirm each step before moving on.

Replace the [PLACEHOLDERS] with your own details before you send it.

How to try it

  1. Note the model numbers of your router and any spare kit, and whether you can run a cable.
  2. Follow ChatGPT’s steps one at a time, sending screenshots if a menu looks different.
  3. Test the speed in the problem room afterwards and write down the settings you changed.

Read the full guide →

More tech help use cases

Sort out battery drain and notification overload with Gemini

An Android Police writer asked Gemini about a handful of Pixel annoyances. It traced battery drain to a power-hungry app running in the background, and pointed to Notification History so the writer could switch off only the notification types they didn't need.

Full guide →

Ask your appliance manuals questions with NotebookLM

An Android Police writer uploads the manual for every new appliance to NotebookLM, then asks plain questions such as how often to clean the filter or what a flashing red light means, instead of scrolling through a long PDF.

Full guide →

Check a suspicious ‘your account will be closed’ email with ChatGPT before you click

ConsumerAffairs pasted a reader's 'Microsoft 365 deactivation' email into ChatGPT, which rated it very likely phishing. It pointed to the scare tactics, vague wording, a big 'Verify Here' button, an unrelated company footer and a link that bounced through a non-Microsoft address.

Full guide →

Reference: Melgart blog